Nizo S8L

I never really did think I was alone.

But recently I had cause to inquire about the availability of Super 8 film stock. The basic idea is to experiment with shooting — and processing — Super 8 black and white reversal film. There’s more background to this, but that’s the short and long of it.

So I found a company in Germany, Kahl Film, which not only produces black and white reversal film, but also processing equipment, re-usable cartridges and so forth. I filled in their contact form, and the proprietor actually went so far as to call me — in Namibia — on the phone. From Germany.

That sort of devotion to customer service is quite startling in our day and age, but I’m getting service (albeit not phone calls) just as good from, so it’s not just them. I think it’s something to do with the fact that film users know what we want, and the people who sell us products know that the “easy option” is to go digital. They have to give us good service.

I’m simplifying a little bit, but I think it’s to do with the rearguard nature of our devotion. All facts one way or the other notwithstanding, the consensus today is that digital is better, and that the ‘filmers’ are being either heroic in the sense that we’re preserving a ‘lost art’, contrary, or both.

I won’t deny that I am contrary, but I think that film is far from a lost art, and in fact continues to outperform digital photography — whether still or moving — in certain very crucial ways. I read today in the print edition of the German Macwelt (Print? How quaint …) that modern compact cameras’ lenses can’t sensibly resolve images higher than 12 megapixels. Also there is the matter of sensor noise and what have you. I was left with a strange sense of unquantifiable vindication. For far less money than a modern medium format outfit, even factoring in film, My Yashicamat 124 and Epson scanner offer more megapixels with less noise, and the ‘Mat has class.

Which brings me back to my point, I think: Backlash.

I’m not the only one who’s gone back to film, and I don’t think I’ll be the last. Not by a long shot. My gut instinct tells me that film photography is currently placing a far greater emphasis on classical technique precisely because of the lack of wiggle-room, and because of the absence of post-processing temptation, and that that results in very fine photographs. The fact that they’re not beset by sensor noise or limited to 12 megapixels is bonus.


About lidlesseye

Mouthing off about photography, and occasionally important things too.

Posted on February 26, 2008, in Culture, Photography. Bookmark the permalink. 1 Comment.

  1. I’m glad that there are some more people on the world, who’ve decided to use film. I am the only one in my circle of friends and it makes me a little bit lonely, cause nobody understands how wonderful film is. Thanks.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: